Muncy v. SSA

Plaintiff: James Wilson Muncy
Defendant: SSA
Case Number: 6:2013cv00024
Filed: January 30, 2013
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Office: London Office
County: Harlan
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 24, 2015 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 9 ] is DENIED; (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 14 ] is GRANTED (3) JUDGMENT in favor of the Defendant will be entered contemporaneously herewith. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 02/24/2015.(KJA)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muncy v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Wilson Muncy
Represented By: Otis Doan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.