King et al v. Storm et al
| Jimmy King and Renee King |
| Milton Storm, Laurel County Sheriff's Office and Laurel County, Kentucky |
| 6:2015cv00172 |
| September 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Laurel |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 21 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED accordingly: 1. The Defendants motion for Summary Judgment [R. 21 ] is GRANTED IN PART. The follo wing claims are DISMISSED from the lawsuit: a. The § 1983 claim of excessive force against Jimmy King; b. The § 1983 claim of malicious prosecution against Jimmy and Renee King; c. The false arrest and false imprisonment claims against Ji mmy and Renee King; d. The malicious prosecution claim against Jimmy and Renee King; e. The lack of supervision, training, and monitoring claim against Laurel County Sheriff's Office and Laurel County, Kentucky; and f. Both vicarious liab ility claims against Laurel County Sheriffs Department and Laurel County, Kentucky; 2. The Defendants' motion for Summary Judgment [R. 21 ] is DENIED IN PART. The following claim will proceed: a. The § 1983 claim of excessive force against Renee King. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 05/17/2017.(KJA)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
