Taylor et al v. University of the Cumberlands
| James Taylor and Dinah Taylor |
| University of the Cumberlands |
| 6:2016cv00109 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Whitley |
| Gregory F. VanTatenhove |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: First Motion [R. 107 at 2] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The communications between Dr. Taylor's counsel and Ms. Sue Wake are potentially relevant to bias and are an appropriate area for questioning by the Univ ersity. Second Motion [R. 107 at 2-3] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Third Motion [R. 107 at 4] is DENIED AS MOOT. Fourth Motion [R. 107 at 4-5] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. First and Second Motion [R. 111 at 3-6] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . Third Motion [R. 111 at 7-9] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Fourth Motion [R. 111 at 9] is DENIED AS MOOT. Fifth Motion [R. 111 at 9-10] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Sixth Motion [R. 111 at 11-12] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Seventh Motion [R. 111 at 12-15] is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. First Motion [R. 106 at 3] is DENIED AS MOOT. Second and Third Motions [R. 106 at 3-4] are DENIED. First Motion [R. 108 at 1] is DENIED AS MOOT. Second Motion [R. 108 at 4-5] is GRANTE D. The Court OVERRULES the Universitys objections [R. 133 ] to Dr. Huff's testimony. Fourth Motion is GRANTED. Rulings on the University's Objections to the Taylors' Deposition Excerpts: First Objection [R. 133 ] is OVERRULED. See Section II.D. Second Objection [R. 133 ] is SUSTAINED. See Section II.D. Third Objection [R. 133 ] is SUSTAINED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 01/09/2019.(KJA)cc: COR Modified to create link on 1/10/2019 (KJA).
|
|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS: 1. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment [R. 112 ] is DENIED; and 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Complaint or Reconsider Summary Judgment [R. 113 ] is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiffs' Motion to reduce Defendant's time for response is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 10/31/2018.(KJA)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 70 ] is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART; 2. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 70 ] is DENIED as to the Taylors' breach of contract claim ; and 3. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [R. 70 ] is GRANTED as to the Taylors' claims of slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, reformation, and punitive damages. Motions terminated: 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment by University of the Cumberlands filed by University of the Cumberlands. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 9/7/2018.(RBB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: the Taylors' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [R. 38 ] is DENIED. Motions terminated: 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Dinah Taylor, James Taylor filed by Dinah Taylor, James Taylor. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 3/29/2018.(RBB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [R. 12] and the Supplemental Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [R. 18] are GRANTED as to Count VII, "Termination of ERISA Prot ected Benefits, and Count VIII Unjust Enrichment." 2. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [R. 12 ] and the Supplemental Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [R. 18 ] are DENIED as to all remaining cl aims. Motions terminated: 12 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by University of the Cumberlands filed by University of the Cumberlands, and 18 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by University of the Cumberlands filed by University of the Cumberlands. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 2/7/2017.(RBB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
