Stanley v. Smith et al

Stanley v. Smith et al

Defendant:	Billy Joe Smith and David Westerfield
Case Number:	6:2016cv00264
Filed:	November 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office:	London Office
County:	Laurel
Presiding Judge:	David L. Bunning
Presiding Judge:	Hanly A. Ingram
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2019	Filing 108 OPINION & ORDER: This case is about a constable that ignored the peace aspect of being a peace officer. The Court orders as follows: 1. The Court GRANTS DE 67 , Westerfield's motion for summary judgment; 2. The Court DENIES AS MOOT DE 68 , St anley's motion to exclude; 3. The Court, as to liability, GRANTS DE 69 , Stanley's motion for summary judgment. As to damages, those questions are for the jury; 4. The Court DENIES AS MOOT DE 70 , Smith's motion to exclude; 5. The Co urt GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART DE 71 , Smith's motion for summary judgment; 6. The Court DENIES AS MOOT DE 73 , Westerfield's motion to exclude; 7. The Court GRANTS DE 100 , Smith's motion for leave to file a surreply; 8. The Court DENIES DE 103 , Stanley's motion for leave to file a reply to Smith's surreply; and 9. The Court will set a status conference (for evaluation of future case steps) by separate order. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 09/30/2019.(MM)cc: COR

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2019

Filing 108 OPINION & ORDER: This case is about a constable that ignored the peace aspect of being a peace officer. The Court orders as follows: 1. The Court GRANTS DE 67 , Westerfield's motion for summary judgment; 2. The Court DENIES AS MOOT DE 68 , St anley's motion to exclude; 3. The Court, as to liability, GRANTS DE 69 , Stanley's motion for summary judgment. As to damages, those questions are for the jury; 4. The Court DENIES AS MOOT DE 70 , Smith's motion to exclude; 5. The Co urt GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART DE 71 , Smith's motion for summary judgment; 6. The Court DENIES AS MOOT DE 73 , Westerfield's motion to exclude; 7. The Court GRANTS DE 100 , Smith's motion for leave to file a surreply; 8. The Court DENIES DE 103 , Stanley's motion for leave to file a reply to Smith's surreply; and 9. The Court will set a status conference (for evaluation of future case steps) by separate order. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 09/30/2019.(MM)cc: COR

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanley v. Smith et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Billy Joe Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David Westerfield
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?