Richardson v. Butler
Petitioner: Willie Richardson
Respondent: S. Butler
Case Number: 6:2017cv00071
Filed: March 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Presiding Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Petitioner Willie Rayshaun Richardson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. # 1 ) is DENIED; (2) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and (3) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 4/4/18. (MRS)cc: COR, Pro se filer
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Willie Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?