Powell v. Fugate et al
Plaintiff: Jeffery Powell
Defendant: David Fugate, Carlo W B. Young, Tony Smith and Kentucky River Regional Jail Authority
Case Number: 6:2017cv00122
Filed: May 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Perry
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : For all the reasons discussed, and on the terms outlined in this Opinion, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 63 ). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 3/8/19.(SYD)cc: COR
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 OPINION & ORDER : a. The Court ADOPTS DE # 85 , in part, to the extent it denies stipulation and recommends denial of leave to add assault and battery claims against Smith and Young, and an abuse of process claim against Young, and REJECTS DE #85 i n all other respects. b. The Court GRANTS DE # 72 , in part, as discussed in this opinion, and deems the Complaint amended as stated herein. Defendants Young and Smith may file any additional Answer by September 5, 2018. c. The Court doubts the nee d for more discovery, but opens a 30 day window for further discovery by Defendants Young and Smith. d. Defendants shall file any supplement to the existing dispositive motion, as to the amendment grounds only, by October 5, 2018. Plaintiff may respond within ten (10) days thereafter; Young and Smith may reply within five (5) further days. The entire dispositive motion then shall stand submitted for decision. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 8/27/18.(SYD)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Powell v. Fugate et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffery Powell
Represented By: Michael Alan Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Fugate
Represented By: Jonathan C. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlo W B. Young
Represented By: Jonathan C. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tony Smith
Represented By: Jonathan C. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky River Regional Jail Authority
Represented By: Jonathan C. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?