Anderson v. Knox County et al
Plaintiff: William Anderson
Defendant: Knox County, John Pickard, Derek Eubanks, Jason York, Brian Johnson, Mark Mefford, Jackie Joseph and Tyson Lawson
Case Number: 6:2017cv00133
Filed: May 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: Knox
Presiding Judge: Karen K. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 205 OPINION & ORDER : 1) the motion for summary judgment (DE 162 ) by Knox County, John Pickard, and Derek Eubanks is GRANTED; 2) the motion for summary judgment (DE 176 ) by Brian Johnson, Mark Mefford, Jackie Joseph, Tyson Lawson, and Jason York is GRANTED; 3) the motions to exclude (DE 163 , 164 ) are DENIED as moot; and 4) the Court will enter a judgment consistent with this opinion. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/31/22.(SYD)cc: COR
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 57 OPINION & ORDER : (1) The Knox County Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (DE 25), is GRANTED as toCount II (Fourteenth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count III(Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process), Count X (Kentucky lawintentional in fliction of emotional distress), and Count XI (Kentucky lawrespondeat superior); and is otherwise DENIED.(2) The KSP Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (DE 30), is GRANTED as to Count II(Fourteenth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count III (Four teenthAmendment substantive due process), and Count X (Kentucky law intentionalinfliction of emotional distress); and is otherwise DENIED.(3) Defendant Lawsons Motion to Dismiss, (DE 29), is GRANTED as to Count II(Fourteenth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count III (FourteenthAmendment substantive due process), and Count X (Kentucky law intentionalinfliction of emotional distress); and is otherwise DENIED.As a result, the following claims survive against all defendants: Count I (mali ciousprosecution), Count II (Fourth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count V (failureto intervene), and Count VI (conspiracy). In addition, the following claims survive against the supervisory defendants: Count IV (supervisor liability), Cou nt VIII (Kentucky lawmalicious prosecution), and Count IX (Kentucky law negligent supervision).Further, Count VIII (Kentucky law malicious prosecution) survives for the nonsupervisorydefendants, and Andersons Count VII Monell claims against Knox County forfailure to train and failure to supervise proceed. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 10/3/18.(SYD)cc: COR
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 OPINION AND ORDER: 1) The Knox County Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (DE 25), is GRANTED as to Count II (Fourteenth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count III Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process), Count X (Kentucky law intentional infliction of emotional distress), and Count XI (Kentucky law respondeat superior); and is otherwise DENIED ; 2)KSP Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (DE 30), is GRANTED as to Count II (Fourteenth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count III (Four teenth Amendment substantive due process), and Count X (Kentucky law intentional infliction of emotional distress); and is otherwise DENIED ; 3) Defendant Lawsons Motion to Dismiss, (DE 29), is GRANTED as to Count II (Fourteenth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count III (Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process), and Count X (Kentucky law intentional infliction of emotional distress); and is otherwise DENIED. Following claims survive against all defendants: Count I (malicious prose cution), Count II (Fourth Amendment fabrication of evidence claim), Count V (failure to intervene), and Count VI (conspiracy). In addition, the following claims survive against the supervisory defendants: Count IV (supervisor liability), Count VIII ( Kentucky law malicious prosecution), and Count IX (Kentucky law negligent supervision). Further, Count VIII (Kentucky law malicious prosecution) survives for the nonsupervisory defendants, and Andersons Count VII Monell claims against Knox County for failure to train and failure to supervise proceed. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/27/2018.(RC)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Knox County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Anderson
Represented By: Michael I. Kanovitz
Represented By: Arthur Loevy
Represented By: Jon Loevy
Represented By: Elliot Slosar
Represented By: Amy Robinson Staples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Knox County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Pickard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derek Eubanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Mefford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackie Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyson Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?