McDaniel v. Jones et al
Plaintiff: Joseph McDaniel
Defendant: R. Jones and USA
Case Number: 6:2018cv00057
Filed: February 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David L. Bunning
Presiding Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. # 20 ) is GRANTED; (2) McDaniels's federal constitutional claim against defendant Jones and FTCA claim against the United States are both DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and (4) A corresponding Judgment will be entered this date. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 08/05/2018.(KJA)cc: COR, mailed paper copy to pro se filer via US Mail
March 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) McDaniels's Bivens claim against Officer Bond and second FTCA claim against the USA, both of which relate to alleged events at USP-Coleman, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) McDaniels's only remainin g claims are his Bivens claim against Health Services Administrator R. Jones and first FTCA claim against the USA, both of which relate to alleged events at USP-McCreary;(3) The Deputy Clerk shall prepare (3) "Service Packets" for serviceu pon Health Services Administrator R. Jones and the USA. (4) The Clerk shall send the Service Packets to the USMS in Lexington, KY, and note the date of delivery in the docket; (5) The USMS shall personally serve Health Services Administrator R. Jon es at the USP McCreary in Pine Knot, KY through arrangement with the FBOP; (6) The USMS shall serve the USA by sending Service Packets by certified or registered mail to both the Civil Process Clerk at the US Attorney for the EDKy and the US Attor ney General in Washington, D.C.; and (7) McDaniels must immediately advise the Clerks Office of any change in his current mailing address. If McDaniels fails to do so, the Court will dismiss his case; and If McDaniels wishes to seek relief from th e Court, he must do so by filing a formal motion sent to the Clerk's Office. Every motion McDaniels files must include a written certification that he has mailed a copy of it to the dfts or their counsel and state the date of mailing. The Court will disregard letters sent to the Judge's chambers or motions lacking a certificate of service. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 03/13/2018.(KJA)cc: COR, mailed paper copy to pro se filer
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDaniel v. Jones et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?