Battle v. Warden, USP McCreary
Petitioner: Tavaris Delino Battle
Respondent: Warden, USP McCreary
Case Number: 6:2018cv00065
Filed: March 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: London Office
County: McCreary
Presiding Judge: Danny C. Reeves
Presiding Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Battle's petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Record No. 1 ] is DENIED. 2. This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 3/21/2018.(RBB)cc: COR, paper copy to pro se filer, Tavaris Delino Battle, via US Mail.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Battle v. Warden, USP McCreary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tavaris Delino Battle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, USP McCreary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?