Ponder v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
| Brian Ponder |
| CSX Transportation, Inc. |
| 6:2018cv00221 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| London Office |
| Rockcastle |
| Karen K Caldwell |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: 1) Within 21 days from the date of service of this order, parties meet; 2) Within 10 days after the meeting the parties shall FILE joint report; Counsel may use Form 52 as the form of the joint status report; If this matter involves a corporation, this party is directed to advsie the Court at the time of the submission of the report. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 9/24/18. Rule 26 Meeting Report due as stated within the order. (MRS) cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CSX Transportation, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent CSX Corporation for CSX Transportation, Inc... (Payne, Rodney) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY RE: FAILURE TO FILE FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURES to counsel of record, R. Payne re: #6 Answer to Complaint has been filed by CSX Transportation, Inc. without the required Rule 7.1 Disclosure statement. Rule 7.1 Disclosures must be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days. Failure to file the Disclosure Statement will cause the case to be submitted to the presiding judge for further action. cc: COR (MRS) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by CSX Transportation, Inc..(Payne, Rodney) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Karen K. Caldwell for OFMR: #6 Answer to Complaint (MRS) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Ponder via Certified Mail Service to (Reed, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Ponder via Certified Mail to CSX Transportation, Inc. served on 8/23/2018, answer due 9/13/2018. (Reed, Kenneth) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY TO Kenneth Reed re #4 Summons Returned Executed as to CSX Transportation: Within 7 calendar days, file the summons with the certified mail receipt attached (green card), as an electronic attachment to a document entitled Notice of Filing with a certificate of service. cc: COR (SYD) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CSX Transportation, Inc.; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (RC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4147450), filed by Brian Ponder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(RC) |
| Conflict Check run. (RC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ponder v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rodney Dale Payne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Ponder | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth R. Reed |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
