Baldwin v. Barnhart
| Jerome Keith Baldwin |
| J. A. Barnhart |
| 6:2018cv00248 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Robert E Wier |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jerome Keith Baldwin re #5 Order. (RBB) Modified on 10/15/2018 (RBB). Note: DE #5 Order mailed to Jerome Keith Baldwin at 7718 Warwick Boulevard, Newport News, VA 23607 on 10/15/2018. |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Certified Mail to Warden, FCI Manchester re #5 Order. Delivered on 10/5/2018. (KJA) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Certified Mail to U.S. Attorney EDKy re #5 Order. (KJA) Modified to stated dated of delivery as 10/5/2018 on 10/10/2018 (KJA). |
Filing 5
ORDER : 1. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of the petition and this Order by certified mail to both (a) Respondent J.A. Barnhart, Warden at the FCI in Manchester, Kentucky, and (b) the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky. 2. Within 60 days from the entry of this Order, Respondent shall file a response to the petition. 3. Baldwin must send a copy of every document he files with the Court to Respondent or his attorney. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 10/2/18.(SYD)cc: mailed to pro se filer (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/3/2018: #1 certified mail envelopes) (SYD).
|
| Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(KJA) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Jermon Keith Baldwin, pro se, received by the Clerk of Court on 9/13/2018 concerning payment of filing fee and alternate mailing address. (Attachments: #1 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 09/11/2018) (KJA) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 6007252.), filed by Jerome Keith Baldwin, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Incident Report and Administrative Remedy, #2 Receipt, #3 mailing envelope, postmarked 9/26/2018)(KJA) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (KJA) |
| Conflict Check run. (KJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baldwin v. Barnhart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: J. A. Barnhart | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jerome Keith Baldwin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
