Humphrey v. J. Barnhart
William R. Humphrey |
USA and Warden J. Barnhart |
6:2018cv00302 |
November 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
P SO |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JUDGMENT: 1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by William R. Humphrey [R. 1] is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding. 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent, Warden J. Barnhart. 3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 1/16/2019.(JMB)cc: COR, William Humphrey via US Mail |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Petitioner William R. Humphreys petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. 1] is DENIED. 2. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Courts docket. 3. Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 1/16/2019.(JMB)cc: COR, William Humphrey via US Mail |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OF CLARIFICATION by William R. Humphrey, PRO SE. A motion to stay was sent to the District Court in Nashville. (Attachments: #1 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 12/27/18)(SYD) |
Filing 8 Filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 6007358 (SYD) |
Filing 7 ORDER: 1. Warden J. Barnhart is SUBSTITUTED for the United States of America as the respondent in this proceeding. 2. Humphrey's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [R. #2 ] is DENIED. 3. Humphrey must pay the $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within 21 days. If he does not, the Court will deny the petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 4. Humphrey's Motion to Stay and/or Summary Judgment [R. #4 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 11/28/18. (SYD)cc: mailed to pro se filer |
Party J. Barnhart added. Party USA terminated. (SYD) |
Filing 6 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 SAMPLE PAGE)(SYD) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William R. Humphrey, pro se, MOTION for Summary Judgment by William R. Humphrey, prose. Motions referred to P SO. (SYD) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by William R. Humphrey, PRO SE. (SYD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William R. Humphrey, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (SYD) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William R. Humphrey, PRO SE. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support styled "Motion Section 2255(e), by Section 2241, #2 mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 11/27/18)(SYD) |
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PRO SE for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William R. Humphrey, #4 MOTION to Stay re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William R. Humphrey MOTION for Summary Judgment by William R. Humphrey (SYD) |
Conflict Check run. (SYD) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PRO SE for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (SYD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.