Bowling v. Boardwalk Real Estate, LLC et al
Dalton Bowling |
Boardwalk Real Estate, LLC and Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, LP |
6:2019cv00161 |
July 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Gregory F VanTatenhove |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Gregory F. Van Tatenhove for review: re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Dalton Bowling (MRS) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Dalton Bowling filed by Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, LP. (Miller, Donald) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Dalton Bowling (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Shultz, Tanner) |
Filing 3 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, LP identifying Corporate Parent Family Dollar Stores, LP, Corporate Parent Family Dollar Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Family Dollar Stores, Inc. for Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, LP.. (MM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jackson Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-73. ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4403514), filed by Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure Statement)(MM) |
Conflict Check run. (MM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.