United Financial Casualty Company v. Hoskins et al
| United Financial Casualty Company |
| Virginia Hoskins and Debra Ann Fisher |
| 6:2019cv00261 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Claria Horn Boom |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to all defendants, all dates and deadlines are hereby VACATED, and this matter is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 11/13/19. (MRS) cc: COR
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by United Financial Casualty Company. (Steinmetz, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Debra Ann Fisher, Virginia Hoskins; Summons issued and returned to counsel electronically (MM) |
| Filing 2 FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United Financial Casualty Company identifying Corporate Parent Progressive Commercial Holdings, Inc. for United Financial Casualty Company. (MM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $400; receipt number 0643-4510186), filed by United Financial Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(MM) |
| Conflict Check run. (MM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
