King v. SSA
Plaintiff: Bessie Ann King
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Case Number: 6:2020cv00251
Filed: December 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: David L Bunning
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Commissioner of SSA. (Morgan, Cheryl)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS (USM 285 Form) Returned Executed by Bessie Ann King via certified mail to Commissioner of SSA served on 1/12/2021. Service to U.S. Attorney executed via certified mail on 1/5/21; Service to U.S. Attorney General executed via certified mail on 1/11/21. (SYD)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of SSA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons issued and delivered to U.S. Marshal for service (KJA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/30/2020: #1 Receipt) (MM).
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #1 ) is hereby GRANTED. The tendered Complaint (Doc. #2 ) shall be made a permanent part of the record herein, and Plaintiff may proceed without payment of costs or fees. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 12/30/2020. (KJA)cc: COR
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 GENERAL ORDER 20-17 re: Filing of Answers and Administrative Transcripts in Social Security Benefit Cases: 1. For cases challenging Final decisions of Commission of Social Security involving denial of benefits, the time for filing an Answer and administrative transcript is extended to 120 days following service of process. 2. This Order applies to pending cases in which Answers have not been filed and future cases through April 1, 2021. 3. Extensions given by this Order expire 4/1/2021. Expiration of Order does not prohibit Commissioner from seeking additional extensions in individual cases. Signed by Chief Judge Danny C. Reeves on September 25, 2020. cc: COR, USA (SYD)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (SYD)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of David L. Bunning for review: re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bessie Ann King (SYD)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Bessie Ann King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Idenifier, #3 Summons Atty General, #4 Summons US Atty, #5 Summons SSA)(SYD)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bessie Ann King (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(SYD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bessie Ann King
Represented By: Patrick Maurice House
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA
Represented By: Cheryl D. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?