Blansett v. Cornett et al
| Mary Louise Blansett |
| City of Hazard, Kentucky and Jessica Cornett |
| 6:2021cv00055 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Hanly A Ingram |
| Robert E Wier |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY William F. McMurry by Clerk re: L.R. 83- Attorney Admission procedure w/ a copy of L.R. 83 and Attorney Admission Application (JMB) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Mikell T. Grafton by Clerk re: L.R. 83- Attorney Admission procedure w/ a copy of L.R. 83 and Attorney Admission Application (JMB) |
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court HEREBY ORDERS that a TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE is set for 8/9/2021 at 11:00 AM in LONDON before Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. The call will be off the record and for counsel only. To join the teleconference, the parties are DIRECTED to call AT&T Teleconferencing at 1-888-675-2535, to enter Access Code 8810053 (followed by "#"), and, when requested, enter the Security Code 2155 (followed by "#"). re #3 REW Standing Case Management and Referral Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 05/10/2021.(KJA)cc: COR, London Diary
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. The parties shall exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by May 10, 2021. These disclosures need not be filed in the Court record. Supplementation due within 30 days of discovery of new info or the need to supplement, but no later than 30 days prior to the discovery deadline. 2. The parties shall file any motions to join additional parties or amend pleadings by November 1, 2021. 3. The parties shall complete all fact discovery by November 1, 2021, with supplementation per Rule 26(e) by December 30, 2021. The parties shall complete all expert discovery by June 30, 2022. 4. Per Rule 26(a)(2), no later than January 31, 2022, Plaintiffs shall disclose the identity of expert witnesses who may be used at trial, accompanied by written reports. These need not be filed in the Court record. Defendants by March 15, 2022. 5. No later than August 15, 2022, counsel for the parties shall file all dispositive motions. Response and reply time per local rule. 6. In accordance with District Judge Wier's referral order (D.E. #3 ), the Court declines to schedule a pretrial conference, trial, or deadlines for related filings at this time. 7. The Court builds the case schedule based on party input. Modification of thisschedule thus is disfavored and will only occur under the standards and mechanics of Rule 16 and/or Rule 6, as applicable. 8. Other than the agreed-upon discovery limits within the parties' Rule 26(f) report, the default limits within the discovery rules apply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram(KJA)cc: COR
|
| Filing 8 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by City of Hazard, Kentucky, Jessica Cornett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Baldwin, Jeffrey) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Robert E. Wier for review: #8 Disclosures (JMB) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING by City of Hazard, Kentucky, Jessica Cornett (Attachments: #1 Joint Report of Parties Planning Meeting)(Baldwin, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Jessica Cornett (Baldwin, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by City of Hazard, Kentucky, Jessica Cornett (Baldwin, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT: (1) Within 21 days, the parties, by counsel, shall meet, either in person or by telephone, to consider the topics Rule 26(f)(2) mandates. (2) Within 14 days of the meeting, the parties shall file a joint status report containing: see items a-e. Consent form attached. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 4/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Magistrate Form)(JMB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT AND REFERRAL ORDER: 1. At the outset, the Court reminds the parties that, under Rule 1, they share with the Court the duty to construe, administer, and employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this action; 2. Pursuant to 28:636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Court refers this case to the appropriate United States Magistrate Judge for this Division; 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the Court retains for decision any motion dispositive of a claim or defense (as well as motions regulating the trial proof, including Daubert and motions in limine); 4. Concurrent with the filing of any Rule 12 motion, the moving party may file, as a separate motion, any request for a discovery stay pending resolution. The Court refers consideration of any such motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge; 5. Discovery Disputes shall be resolved as defined within this order; The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter this Standing Order in the undersigned's civil cases excepting Social Security, pro se, and prisoner post-conviction matters at case opening (or as the Court otherwise directs). Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier.. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 11/13/2019.(JMB)cc: COR
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Perry Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00055. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 0643-4938705), filed by City of Hazard, Kentucky, Jessica Cornett. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JMB) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Hazard, Kentucky, Jessica Cornett. (Filed as part of State Court Record attached to the Notice of Removal #1 ). (JMB) |
| Conflict Check run. (JMB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
