Watkins v. Swaney
Petitioner: Carl Ravon Watkins
Respondent: Warden G. Swaney and G. Swaney
Case Number: 6:2022cv00236
Filed: December 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: William O Bertelsman
Referring Judge: P SO
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT: 1. Petitioner Carl Ravon Watkins's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. 1] is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 02/14/2023.(KJA)cc: COR and Carl Ravon Watkins by US Mail
February 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1. Watkins's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [R. #2 ] is DENIED; 2. Watkinss petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 [R. #1 ] is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; 3. This action is STRICKEN from the Court's docket; and 4. A corresponding Judgment will be entered this date. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 02/14/2023.(KJA)cc: COR and Carl Ravon Watkins by US Mail
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(Powers, Joshua)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Ravon Watkins (Powers, Joshua)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Conflict Check run. (Powers, Joshua)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Carl Ravon Watkins. (Powers, Joshua)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Ravon Watkins Motions referred to P SO. (Powers, Joshua)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Carl Ravon Watkins, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Post Mark Illegible)(Powers, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watkins v. Swaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carl Ravon Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden G. Swaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: G. Swaney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?