EQT Production Company v. Phillips et al
EQT Production Company |
Dale A. Phillips and Phillips Law Office |
7:2016cv00164 |
August 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Pikeville Office |
Johnson |
Edward B. Atkins |
Amul R. Thapar |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Dfts Dale A. Phillips and the Phillips Law Offices Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 70) is hereby granted;(2) Plaf EQT Production Companys legal-malpractice claim againstDfts Dale A. Phillips and the Phillip s Law Office is hereby dismissed, and the consolidated case, EQT Prod. Co. v. Phillips, 7:16-cv-164-DLB-EBA is dismissed and stricken from the Court's active docket; (3) Dfts John Keller and Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLPs third par tyclaims against Dfts Dale A. Phillips and the Phillips Law Office (Doc. # 23) are hereby dismissed; (4) Dfts John Keller and Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP's Motion for S/J (Doc. # 71) is hereby denied; and(5) Within tw enty (20) days from the date of the entry of this MemorandumOpinion and Order , remaining parties shall file a Joint Status Report, setting forth available dates for a Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, and whether they would be amenable to a court-facilitated settlement conference. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 4/27/18.(MJY)cc: COR Modified text on 4/27/2018 (MJY). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.