Benton v. Joyner et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Benton
Defendant: Hector Joyner, E A Earwin, D. Attizer and M Duff
Case Number: 7:2020cv00131
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Gregory F VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2020 ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Pro Se for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Benton, Pro Se. (MJY)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers. (Attachments: #1 Sample caption page) cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (MJY)
October 23, 2020 Conflict Check run. (MJY)
October 23, 2020 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jeffrey Benton, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Postmark not legible)(MJY)
October 23, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey Benton, Pro Se. Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Postmark not legible)(MJY) Modified text on 10/23/2020 (MJY).
October 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to Judge P SO., filed by Jeffrey Benton, Pro Se.(MJY) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/23/2020: #1 Letter from Jeffrey Benton, #2 Affidavit of Jeffrey Benton, #3 Rejection Notice dated 09-15-20, #4 Exhibit A - USP Big Sandy Modified Movement & documents, #5 Exhibit B - Rejection Notice & Letter, #6 Exhibit C - Letter & USP operations Memos, #7 Exhibit D - Requests & Rejection notices, #8 Envelope - Postmark not legible) (MJY).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benton v. Joyner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hector Joyner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E A Earwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Attizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M Duff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Benton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?