Waste Connections of Kentucky et al v. Cave City, Kentucky

Plaintiff: Superlube, Incorporated and Waste Connections of Kentucky
Defendant: Cave City, Kentucky
Case Number: 1:2007cv00059
Filed: March 26, 2007
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Barren
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waste Connections of Kentucky et al v. Cave City, Kentucky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Superlube, Incorporated
Represented By: Bradley A. Aulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Waste Connections of Kentucky
Represented By: Bradley A. Aulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cave City, Kentucky
Represented By: Bobby H. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?