Ragle et al v. Monticello Banking Company et al
Plaintiff: Robert Ragle and Laura Marlene Ragle
Defendant: Monticello Banking Company, Richard Owens and Son Construction, Inc. and Richard Owens
Case Number: 1:2012cv00198
Filed: November 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Russell
Presiding Judge: H. Brent Brennenstuhl
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 06/11/2014 granting 60 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining state-law claims be REMANDED to the Russell Circuit Court. cc: Counsel of Record, Russell Circuit Court (TJD)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 9/4/2013. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Monticello Banking Company and Richard Owens' (acting in his official capacity for Monticello) Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED (DN 37 ) and Defendant Monticello is dismissed from this action. Defendant Monticello Banking Company's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony is DENIED as moot (DN 23 ). cc: Counsel (CDR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ragle et al v. Monticello Banking Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Ragle
Represented By: Joel R. Smith
Represented By: Robert L. Bertram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Marlene Ragle
Represented By: Joel R. Smith
Represented By: Robert L. Bertram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monticello Banking Company
Represented By: Frank V. Phillips
Represented By: Bart L. Greenwald
Represented By: Van F. Phillips
Represented By: William T. Repasky
Represented By: Allison E. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Owens and Son Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Donald H. Byrom
Represented By: Brian L. Schuette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Owens
Represented By: Donald H. Byrom
Represented By: Brian L. Schuette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?