Littrell v. St. Thomas Glen Resort
| Dean Littrell |
| St. Thomas Glen Resort |
| 1:2018cv00117 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
AGREED ORDER TO REMAND by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/25/18: The herein case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Clinton County, KY for further proceedings in and through Civil Action No. 18-CI-00101. cc:counsel, State Court (DJT)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation by St. Thomas Glen Resort. (Hall, H.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 8/31/2018. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl will conduct a telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on 10/26/2018 at 1:30 pm CDT. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel who will try the case shall participate. Meeting of the parties due by 10/5/2018. Rule 26 Joint Meeting Report due by 10/5/2018. See Order for further detail. cc:counsel; KL-Case Manager (JWM)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 08/30/2018; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel; KLL (TJD)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by St. Thomas Glen Resort. (Hall, H.) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by St. Thomas Glen Resort. (Hall, Hugh) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL re #1 Notice of Removal from Clinton Circuit Court, Civil Action Number 18-CI-00101. cc: Counsel, Clinton Circuit Court, H. Derek Hall (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by St. Thomas Glen Resort from Clinton Circuit Court, case number 18-CI-00101. ( Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-2701810 ) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Cover Sheet) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Littrell v. St. Thomas Glen Resort | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dean Littrell | |
| Represented By: | David M. Cross |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: St. Thomas Glen Resort | |
| Represented By: | Hugh D. Hall |
| Represented By: | Albert F. Grasch, Jr. |
| Represented By: | H. Derek Hall |
| Represented By: | J. Wesley Harned |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
