Robison v. Harmon et al
| Edwin Jason Robison |
| Brian McPherson and Stephen Harmon |
| 1:2019cv00147 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 11/7/2019 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. However, Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee under an installment plan. (See Order for specifics.) cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Finance (via e-mail); WCRJ Inmate Accts. (CDF) Modified distribution on 11/8/2019 (CDF).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Reason for Deficiency: Prisoner Trust Account Statement Not Included. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 11/18/2019. cc: Edwin Jason Robison, pro se (JWM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Edwin Jason Robison, pro se. (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephen Harmon, Brian McPherson, filed by Edwin Jason Robison, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Summons) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
