Dinning v. Walmart, Inc. et al
| Cindy Dinning |
| Walmart, Inc. and Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership |
| 1:2021cv00005 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Greg N Stivers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 2/23/2021. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures due by 3/25/2021. Joinder of Parties and Amended Pleadings due by 5/20/2021. Pretrial Fact Discovery due by 11/24/2021. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 12/7/2021. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 2/18/2022. Expert Discovery depositions due by 4/20/2022. Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/3/2022 at 9:30 AM CT before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions due by 6/24/2022. (Review Order in full for specifics.) cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (Sharpe, Felix) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 1/12/2021; Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/23/2021 at 9:30 AM CT/10:30 AM ET before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. Counsel who will try the case shall participate in the conference. Parties shall conduct meeting required by Rule 26(f) by 2/2/2021 and file their Rule 26 Meeting Report by 2/16/2021. (Review Order in full for specifics.) cc: Counsel; KL (CDF)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 1/12/2021; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; KLL (TJD)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal, from Barren Circuit Court, Civil Action No. 20-CI-408. cc: Counsel; Barren Circuit Court (JWM) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent WSE Management, LLC, Corporate Parent WSE Investment, LLC, Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC, Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Corporate Parent Walmart Inc. for Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership. by Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership from Barren Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-00408, filed by Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership. ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipts 0644-3257258 ) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-Counsel of Affidavit, #3 Exhibit 3-Walmart's INT & RPFD to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit 4-Plaintiff's INT 17 Answer, #5 Exhibit 5-State Court File, #6 Exhibit 6-Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #7 Cover Sheet) (JWM) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart, Inc.. (DN #1 ) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
