Ball v. Marion Adjustment Center
Plaintiff: Jerry Ball
Defendant: Marion Adjustment Center
Case Number: 3:2008cv00107
Filed: December 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 4/16/09; for the reasons set forth in DN 15 Memorandum and Opinion that the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals in forma pauperis is DENIED because such an appeal would not be taken in good faith. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (SC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ball v. Marion Adjustment Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion Adjustment Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?