United States v. Gash et al

Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: Barry Gash and Scott Cox
Case Number: 3:2008cv00126
Filed: May 15, 2008
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: No cause code entered

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 24, 2008 12 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson III on 11/21/08; Court will enter Order consistent with this Opinion. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (NM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States v. Gash et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry Gash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.