Runkle v. Pancake et al
| Sheila Renee Runkle |
| Frederick W. Kemen |
| 3:2008cv00188 |
| December 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| James D. Moyer |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/24/12; Dr. Kemens motion for partial summary judgment will be granted. Plaintiffs motion to strike will be denied. Plaintiffs claim, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Dr. Kemen violated Runkles constitutional rights will be dismissed with prejudice, and the remaining state law claims will be dismissed without prejudice.cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
126
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge James D. Moyer on 11/17/2010, GRANTING 122 Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 12/16/2009 re 73 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth, Court will grant summary judgment to the Defendants as to all federal issues. State-law claims will be dismissed without prejudice as to these Defendants and left to the state courts. Court will enter a separate order consistent with this Opinion. cc: Counsel (RLK)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/28/2009; re 64 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Commonwealth of Kentucky ; a separate order will be entered in accordance with this opinion.cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/8/2009; 39 Motion to Substitute Party GRANTED; 56 Motion to Alter Judgment GRANTED; 54 Order granting Robert Fleming, D.O.'s motion for summary judgment entered December 24, 2008 is VACATED AND SET ASIDE; 71 Motion to Strike DENIED; 74 motion for leave to file notices as supplements GRANTED; claim of plaintiff against defendant Robert Fleming D.O. under 42 USC 1983 based on Eighth Amendment DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; claims of plaintiff against defendant Robert Fleming D.O. based on Kentucky's statutory right for prisonsers to have health care, medical negligence, outrage, negligence and wrongful death DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. cc:counsel (TLB)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 12/23/08 re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ronald Fleming, MD. Court to enter separate Order. cc:counsel (NM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Runkle v. Pancake et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frederick W. Kemen | |
| Represented By: | Michael R. McDonner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sheila Renee Runkle | |
| Represented By: | Len W. Ogden, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
