Frasca v. State of Maine
Plaintiff: Heidi Ann Frasca
Defendant: State of Maine
Case Number: 3:2009cv00851
Filed: October 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Montgomery-TN
Presiding Judge: John G. Heyburn
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 12/9/2009. 3 Application to proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. For the reasons set forth, the Court will, by separate Order, dismiss the instant action and remand it to the state court of origination.cc: Counsel; Plaintiff, pro se; Clerk of Court, Biddeford District Court (AEP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frasca v. State of Maine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heidi Ann Frasca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Maine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?