Merrick et al v. Diageo Americas Supply, Inc.
| Rose Johnson, Samuel Johnson, Joseph M. Billy, Samantha G Allen, Nancy L Billy, Bruce Merrick and Arthur Milby |
| Diageo Americas Supply, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00334 |
| June 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/11/2014; re 50 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability; The court believes that the determination of the Clean Air Acts preemptive effect on state common law tort claims is a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, and that an immediate appeal from so much of our March 19, 2014 Memorandum Opinion and Order (incorporated herein) holding that the Clean Air Act does not preempt state common law causes of action may materially advance the termination of the litigation.cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/18/14; re 28 MOTION for Leave to file Supplemental Authority; 38 MOTION to Strike; 18 Motion to Dismiss. A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion. cc:counsel (TG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
