Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Unions No. 502 & 633 Pension Trust Fund et al v. F.S. Scharden & Sons, Inc.
| Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Unions No. 502 & 633 Pension Trust Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 502 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 502 Education & Training Fund and Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 502 |
| F.S. Scharden & Sons, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv00500 |
| August 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| John G. Heyburn |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 3/20/2013 re 11 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is SUSTAINED and judgment in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendant is entered in amount of $213,626.41 plus interest and costs. This is a final order. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Unions No. 502 & 633 Pension Trust Fund et al v. F.S. Scharden & Sons, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Unions No. 502 & 633 Pension Trust Fund | |
| Represented By: | Linda J. Wallbaum |
| Represented By: | Rex Dunn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 502 Health and Welfare Trust Fund | |
| Represented By: | Linda J. Wallbaum |
| Represented By: | Rex Dunn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 502 Education & Training Fund | |
| Represented By: | Rex Dunn |
| Represented By: | Linda J. Wallbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 502 | |
| Represented By: | Rex Dunn |
| Represented By: | Linda J. Wallbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: F.S. Scharden & Sons, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Neil Charles Bordy |
| Represented By: | Charity B. Neukomm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
