Mason v. Bolton

Mason v. Bolton

Plaintiff:	Jason Onteria Mason
Defendant:	Mark Bolton
Case Number:	3:2012cv00639
Filed:	October 9, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Louisville Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 7, 2013	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/6/13; The Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. No certificate of appealability is warranted in this case.cc:Petitioner (pro se), Respondent, Atty General (JBM)
April 16, 2013	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/15/13; Within 28 days from the date of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order Mason must show cause why his § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be dis missed because a judgment of conviction has not been entered against him and/or for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. Mason is WARNED that failure to respond within the time allotted will result in dismissal of the action for the reasons set forth herein. cc: Petitioner, pro se, Respondent (DAK)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 7, 2013

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 6/6/13; The Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. No certificate of appealability is warranted in this case.cc:Petitioner (pro se), Respondent, Atty General (JBM)

April 16, 2013

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/15/13; Within 28 days from the date of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order Mason must show cause why his § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be dis missed because a judgment of conviction has not been entered against him and/or for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. Mason is WARNED that failure to respond within the time allotted will result in dismissal of the action for the reasons set forth herein. cc: Petitioner, pro se, Respondent (DAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mason v. Bolton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Bolton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Onteria Mason
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?