Harville v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Lena C. Harville
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2013cv00417
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Referring Judge: James D. Moyer
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 5, 2015 24 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/2/2015; re 20 Motion for Attorney Fees.cc:counsel (JBM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harville v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lena C. Harville
Represented By: Anthony E. Hoyle(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Brady Miller(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Regina S. Edwards(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?