Zywicki v. Sai Nath, LLC
Plaintiff: John Zywicki
Defendant: Sai Nath, LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00435
Filed: May 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Louisville Office
County: Bullitt
Presiding Judge: David J. Hale
Presiding Judge: Dave Whalin
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 3/24/2017 - Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.N. 32) is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. A separate judgment will be entered this date. cc: Counsel(DAK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zywicki v. Sai Nath, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Zywicki
Represented By: Donald J. Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sai Nath, LLC
Represented By: Jason B. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?