Tassy v. Lindsay Entertainment Enterprises, Inc.
Gloria Tassy |
Lindsay Entertainment Enterprises, Inc. |
3:2016cv00077 |
February 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Jefferson |
Thomas B. Russell |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 021 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 126 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 3/14/2022. Defendant's Motion to Decertify the Class (DE 121 -2) is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 120 -1) as to whether they are cons idered employees under the FLSA is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 120 -1) regarding the applicable statute of limitations under the FLSA is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 120 - 1) regarding liquidated damages under the FLSA is GRANTED. No later than 14 days from the entry of this Order, the parties shall file a proposed scheduling order for resolving any outstanding issues and a status report outlining: i. Any remaining discovery; ii. Any unresolved issues. cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/2/2019 - Lindsay Entertainment Enterprises' Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration pursuant to § 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, (R. 9 ), is HEREBY DENIED. Telephonic Conference set for 4/8/2019 at 10:00 AM Central Time, 11:00 AM Eastern Time, before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. The Court will place the call. cc: Counsel of Record (KD) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/6/2018 granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Compel. With respect to Tassy's request that the Court compel production of the list of putative class members, her motion is granted. With respect to her request for sanctions, her motion is denied. Telephone Conference remains set for 4/18/2018 at 11:30 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. cc: Counsel(JM) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/9/2017 granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Certify Class; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer cc: Counsel(KJA) Modified on 3/9/2017 to modify document type(KJA). |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 18 Motion to Strike ; Telephone Conference set for 7/22/2016 at 10:30 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/8/2016. cc: Counsel(KJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tassy v. Lindsay Entertainment Enterprises, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gloria Tassy | |
Represented By: | Bernard R. Mazaheri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lindsay Entertainment Enterprises, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Philip C. Eschels |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.