Ayers v. Anderson et al
| William Ayers |
| Tim Anderson, John Doe, Jane Doe and Bob Rodriguez |
| 3:2016cv00572 |
| September 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Adair |
| Charles R. Simpson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/13/2020: The Court will dismiss Plaintiff's sole remaining claim with prejudice DN 67 . A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this memorandum opinion. cc: counsel (SRH)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/14/2020. re 58 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment . A separate order shall enter. cc:counsel (KJA)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/2/2018. The court will DENY the Plaintiff's motion to reconsider. An order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. See Memorandum Opinion for details. cc: Counsel (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/21/2018: The court will GRANT the Defendants' motion for summary judgement as to the Plaintiff's claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The court will DENY the Plaintiff's motion to reconsider. An order will be entered in accordance with this opinion. cc: counsel (JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
