Jones-Bey v. Jefferson County Government et al
Gary Lamar Jones-Bey |
Jefferson County Government, Mark E. Bolton, Stephen P. Durham, Dwayne Clark, Martin Baker, Eric Troutman, Walker, Taylor and Correctional Care Solutions |
3:2016cv00657 |
October 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Louisville Office |
Jefferson |
Thomas B. Russell |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/6/2017;, Eric Troutman, Correctional Care Solutions and Taylor (Grievance Coordinator at LMDC) terminated. Within 30 days from the entry date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order , Plaintiff may file an amended complaint. Plaintiff shall sue Defendants in their individual capacities and shall describe the specific facts surrounding how each Defendant allegedly violated his First Amendment rights to free exercise of his religi on and his Eighth Amendment right to medical and dental care. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to place the instant case number and the word Amended on a § 1983 complaint form and send it, along with three summons forms, to Plaintiff for his comp letion.Plaintiff is WARNED that should he fail to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Court will enter an Order dismissing the claims he fails to amend for the reasons stated herein.cc: plaintiff pro se, defendants, Jefferson County Attorney (KJA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.