EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. et al v. Glisson
| EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. and Ernest Marshall, M.D. |
| Vicky Yates Brown Glisson |
| 3:2017cv00189 |
| March 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Louisville Office |
| Jefferson |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Dave Whalin on 10/30/2017 granting in part and denying in part 76 Planned Parenthood's Motion for Sanctions. The Governor's Office is ordered to reimburse Planned Parenthood for actual travel expenses incurred in appearing for the previously scheduled deposition and Planned Parenthood's reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in filing the instant motion for sanctions and reply brief. Planned Parenthood is ordered to submit a detailed bill of costs in that regard by 11/21/2017. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Dave Whalin on 8/30/2017 re 59 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoena. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to prevent the deposition of Governor Bevin (DN 59 ) is GRANTED. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 6/22/2017 granting 19 Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.'s Motion to Intervene. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
