Yuda v. Chest Medicine Associates, PSC.

Plaintiff: Allison Yuda
Defendant: Chest Medicine Associates, PSC.
Case Number: 3:2017cv00365
Filed: June 13, 2017
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Louisville Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 26, 2018 9 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/25/2018 - The motion of the plaintiff is well-taken and is conceded by the defendant. A separate order will be entered granting Yuda's motion and remanding this action to the Jefferson County, Kentucky, Circuit Court.cc:counsel (DAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yuda v. Chest Medicine Associates, PSC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allison Yuda
Represented By: Bryan M. Cassis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chest Medicine Associates, PSC.
Represented By: Trevor L. Earl
Represented By: Rebecca A. Naser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?