EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. et al v. Beshear et al
| Ernest Marshall, M.D. and EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. |
| Andrew G. Beshear, Adam Meier, Michael S. Rodman and Thomas B. Wine |
| 3:2019cv00178 |
| March 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, by EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C., Ernest Marshall, MD. (Cubbage, Amy)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Andrew G. Beshear, Adam Meier, Michael S. Rodman, and Thomas B. Wine. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summonses. (Attachments: #1 Summons Meier, #2 Summons Rodman, #3 Summons Wine). (RLJ)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (RLJ)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew G. Beshear, Adam Meier, Michael S. Rodman, and Thomas B. Wine, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0644-2824454.), filed by Ernest Marshall, M.D., and EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Complaint and Motion - HB 5, #3 Memorandum in Support Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion for TRO/Preliminary Injunction, #4 Proposed Order on Motion for TRO/PI). (RLJ)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
