Lay v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Mark Lay |
Medtronic Care Management Services, LLC, Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc. |
3:2020cv00289 |
April 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S OFFICE NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Jefferson Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Medtronic PLC for Medtronic Care Management Services, LLC, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic, Inc.. (DJT) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (DJT) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [NO ANSWER FILED] by Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic Care Management Services, LLC from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-002212.Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-3087434, filed by Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic Care Management Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Record) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.