Shoemaker v. G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc. et al
Richard Shoemaker |
John Does 1-25 and G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc. |
3:2020cv00520 |
July 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Claria Horn Boom |
Colin H Lindsay |
Justin R Walker |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa R. Lamkin on behalf of G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc. (Lamkin, Melissa) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc.. (Smith, William) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by William E. Smith, III on behalf of G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc. (Smith, William) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF RAPHAEL DEUTSCH signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 9/11/2020; Granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (ALS) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the reassignment protocol set forth in GO 20-16, this matter is reassigned to the docket of Judge Claria H. Boom for all further proceedings. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (ALS) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Raphael Deutsch to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3159840. by Plaintiff Richard Shoemaker (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Deutsch, Raphael) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Raphael Deutsch re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice not filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 8/25/2020. (KJA) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER by Judge Justin R. Walker. The Court strongly encourages all attorneys and their clients to provide substantive speaking opportunities to less experienced attorneys. Newer attorneys often do not have many opportunities to appear and argue in court. Although oral argument is not necessary for ruling on most motions, the Court will hold oral argument if a party (a) requests it in accordance with LR 7.1 (f); and (b) commits to entrusting the argument to an attorney who graduated from law school no more than six years ago. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (MEJ) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER by Judge Justin R. Walker. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court REFERS this matter to U.S. Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay for hearing and determining all pretrial matters pending before the Court in this action. Further, the Court authorizes Judge Colin H. Lindsay to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. Additionally, the Court reminds the parties that they may consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this matter at any time in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1) and LR 73.1. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, CM/ Law Clerk- Lindsay (MEJ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons. (DLW) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Justin R. Walker. (DLW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G.L.A. Collection Company, Inc. and John Does 1-25. Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3147898, filed by Richard Shoemaker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (DLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.