Knoop v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
| Frank R. Knoop, Jr. |
| The Cincinnati Insurance Company and Cincinnati Casualty Company |
| 3:2020cv00589 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Colin H Lindsay |
| Charles R Simpson |
| Insurance |
| 28:1446bc |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Rule 26(a) Disclosures and Documents by Frank R. Knoop, Jr (Lange, Timothy) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ON JOINT REPORT OF THE PLANNING MEETING OF THE PARTIES and REFERRAL ORDER by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 9/24/2020. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 10/16/2020. Expert Discovery due by 12/15/2021. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 9/1/2021. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 10/15/2021. Joinder of Parties/Amended Pleadings due by 4/16/2021. Fact Discovery due by 7/1/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 1/15/2022. This matter is hereby REFERRED to Honorable Colin H. Lindsay, United States Magistrate Judge, for full pretrial/non-dispositive matters. cc: counsel, CHL - CM (DLW)
|
| Filing 10 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by The Cincinnati Casualty Company. (Inman, James) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER BIFURCATING AND STAYING Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 9/15/2020. Count II asserted by Plaintiff Frank R. Knoop, Jr. against Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Co. is hereby BIFURCATED from Count I. Discovery on the claims asserted in Count II is STAYED pending resolution of the claims asserted in Count I. Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Co.'s pending #5 Motion to Dismiss is WITHDRAWN without prejudice to refiling. cc: Counsel (DLW)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Bad Faith Claims, #7 Joint MOTION to Bifurcate Count II, Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery on Count II, Joint MOTION to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss without prejudice linking the Joint Motion at Docket No 7 to Docket No 5 filed by Frank R. Knoop, Jr. (Lange, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Bifurcate Count II, Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery on Count II, Joint MOTION to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss without prejudice by Defendant The Cincinnati Casualty Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Inman, James) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Inman, James) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Bad Faith Claims by Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Inman, James) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Cincinnati Financial Corporation for The Cincinnati Insurance Company. by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Inman, James) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Civil Action No. 20-CI-004511. cc: Counsel; Jefferson Circuit Court (ALS) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson III. (ALS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Cincinnati Insurance Company from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 20-CI-004511 (Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-3168653) filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint w exh, #3 Exhibit 2 - State Court Summonses, #4 Exhibit 3 - KTCR excerpt) (ALS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
