Swint et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Robert James Swint and Sheila Ann Brace-Miller |
SAB Miller Company, Central Intelligence Agency, Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Bush Boake Allen |
3:2021cv00306 |
May 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
David J Hale |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 6/2/2021: This action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final Order. The Court further certifies that an appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants (DLW) |
Filing 4 ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 6/2/2021 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons stated, the Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants (DLW) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert James Swint. (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (MNM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bush Boake Allen, Anheuser-Busch In Bev, Central Intelligence Agency, and SAB Miller Company, filed by Robert James Swint and Sheila Ann Brace-Miller. (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.