Schoenbachler v. Ensite USA, Inc.
| Dave Schoenbachler |
| Ensite USA, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00385 |
| June 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Rebecca Grady Jennings |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ensite USA, Inc.. (Sheller, John) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Defer by Defendant Ensite USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sheller, John) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Motion to Consolidate by Ensite USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A (part 1) - Motion to Consolidate, #2 Exhibit Ex. A (part 2) - Motion to Consolidate, #3 Exhibit Ex. A (part 3) - Motion to Consolidate, #4 Exhibit Ex. A (part 4) - Motion to Consolidate, #5 Exhibit Ex. A (part 5) - Motion to Consolidate) (Sheller, John) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Ensite USA, Inc.. (Sheller, John) |
Filing 19
AGREED ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 8/2/2021 granting #17 Proposed Agreed Order. EnSite's deadline to file its response to the Complaint is 8/4/2021. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Hannah B. Kembel on behalf of Ensite USA, Inc. (Kembel, Hannah) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Agreed Order by Ensite USA, Inc.. (Sheller, John) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by John O. Sheller on behalf of Ensite USA, Inc. (Sheller, John) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Agreed Order Extending Defendant's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Dave Schoenbachler. (Burch, Richard) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/14/2021 granting #12 Motion for Attorney Joseph A. Fitapelli to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/14/2021 granting #11 Motion for Attorney Frank J. Mazzaferro to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Joseph A. Fitapelli to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3380814. by Plaintiff Dave Schoenbachler (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Frank J. Mazzaferro to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3380806. by Plaintiff Dave Schoenbachler (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dave Schoenbachler. Ensite USA, Inc. served on 6/30/2021, answer due 7/21/2021. (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 . Mail sent to Joseph A. Fitapelli. (SMJ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 7/1/2021 granting #7 Motion for Attorney Richard J. Burch to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Richard J. (Rex) Burch to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3373372. by Plaintiff Dave Schoenbachler (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing) (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Deficiency as to Frank J. Mazzaferro re #1 Complaint;Reason for Deficiency: No admission or pro hac vice motion filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/9/2021. (MLG) (Main Document 6 replaced on 6/22/2021) (MLG). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency as to Joseph A. Fitapelli re #1 Complaint;Reason for Deficiency: No admission or pro hac vice motion filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/9/2021. (MLG) (Main Document 5 replaced on 6/22/2021) (MLG). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency as to Richard J. Burch re #1 Complaint;Reason for Deficiency: No admission or pro hac vice motion filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/6/2021. (MLG) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/22/2021) (MLG). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ensite USA, Inc.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons. (SRH) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (SRH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Dave Schoenbachler, against Ensite USA, Inc. Filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3362072. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Handbook Excerpts, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Consent, #3 Exhibit C- Tolling Agreement, #4 Cover Sheet, #5 Summons tendered) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schoenbachler v. Ensite USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ensite USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Hannah B. Kembel |
| Represented By: | John O. Sheller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dave Schoenbachler | |
| Represented By: | Frank J. Mazzaferro |
| Represented By: | Joseph A. Fitapelli |
| Represented By: | Richard J. Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
