Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
| Clifton Clinton Williams, IV |
| City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources |
| 3:2024cv00281 |
| May 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER (EBOC) by Judge David J. Hale on 5/20/2024: The #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff is proceeding without the prepayment of fees, or in forma pauperis, the Court must review the complaint. Once the review is complete, an order will be entered informing the parties of what steps, if any, must be taken. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) (DLW)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 5/9/2024: Pursuant to General Order 24-05 and Local Rule 40.1, the Court, on its own motion and in the interests of justice, reassigns the instant action to Judge David J. Hale for all further proceedings. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel; Plaintiff, pro se; CM-DJH (EAS)
|
| Filing 7 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (EAS) |
| Filing 6 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley Jr. (KJA) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-03227. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (KJA) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Western District of Kentucky.(vfr) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Clifton Clinton Williams IV 146 Clay St. Brooklyn, NY 11222. (sha) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/1/2024) (vfr) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.]
|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Clifton Clinton Williams IV 146 Clay St. Brooklyn, NY 11222. (vn) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER M10-468: To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a partys obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information.Parties may consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the courts electronic docket. A notice directing the parties attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the courts records. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.]
|
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Clifton Clinton Williams, IV..(rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Louisville Police Dept., Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources. Document filed by Clifton Clinton Williams, IV..(rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from nysd on 5/8/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
