Hollingsworth v. The Kroger Co. et al
| Thomas Hollingsworth |
| KRGP, Kimco Realty Corporation, The Kroger Co., Unknown Defendants, Kroger Limited Partnership I, Weingarten Realty Investors and Kroger Food Stores |
| 3:2024cv00400 |
| July 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| David J Hale |
| Colin H Lindsay |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay on 8/29/2024: Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 10/9/2024 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay. Counsel for the Parties shall connect to the conference by dialing 1-650-479-3207 and entering access code 2319 759 1660. Attendees should press # to skip entry of an attendee or host code. cc: Counsel (DLW)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 8/19/2024 granting #9 Proposed Agreed Order. Hollingsworth's claims against The Kroger Co. and Kroger Limited Partnership II are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate The Kroger Co. and Kroger Limited Partnership II as defendants in the record of this matter. cc: Counsel (DLW)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Agreed Order of Dismissal regarding The Kroger Co. and Kroger Limited Partnership II by Kroger Limited Partnership I. (Hornback, Paige) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kimco Realty Corporation, Weingarten Realty Investors. (Fowler, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 Diversity Case Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(2)) by Kimco Realty Corporation. (Fowler, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc., Other Affiliate Vanguard Group, Inc. for Kimco Realty Corporation by Kimco Realty Corporation. (Fowler, Kevin) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 7/12/2024; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Lindsay is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (NWT)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Rule 7.1(a)(1) Corporate Disclosure Statement and Rule 7.1(a)(2) Diversity Disclosure Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/19/2024. (MNM) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Jefferson Circuit Court (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge David J. Hale. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kimco Realty Corporation from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-004091 (filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-4066487). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Settlement Demand, #3 Exhibit C - Consent to Removal, #4 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
| ANSWER to Complaint previously filed in state court action by Kroger Limited Partnership I, Kroger Limited Partnership II, and The Kroger Co. (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
