Vaghela et al v. Noem et al
Narendrasinh Vaghela and Janviba Vaghela |
Kristi Noem and Kika Scott |
3:2025cv00229 |
April 22, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Janviba Vaghela, Narendrasinh Vaghela. Amendment to #3 Notice (Other) Summons by Janviba Vaghela, Narendrasinh Vaghela. (Provax, Nicole) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Nicole Provax to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AKYWDC-4234543. by Plaintiffs Janviba Vaghela, Narendrasinh Vaghela (Provax, Nicole) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Nicole Provax re #1 Complaint,.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 5/6/2025. (KJA) |
Filing 3 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND OTHER RELIEF. (Attachments: #1 Blank Summons) (HMC) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (HMC) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND OTHER RELIEF filed by Narendrasinh Vaghela, Janviba Vaghela against Kristi Noem, Kika Scott. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AKYWDC-4234195. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Tendered Summons) (HMC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.