Tire Recycling, Inc. v. Higdon

Appellant: Tire Recycling, Inc.
Appellee: Robert Higdon
Case Number: 4:2009cv00064
Filed: July 30, 2009
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Owensboro Office
County: Daviess
Referring Judge: E. Robert Goebel
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 30, 2009 10 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 10/29/09. The Bankruptcy Court's order is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. This matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. cc:counsel, USBC- clerk, USBC Judge Stosberg (JBM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tire Recycling, Inc. v. Higdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Tire Recycling, Inc.
Represented By: David Cantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Robert Higdon
Represented By: John W. Tullis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?