Ivy v. Wathen et al
| Marcus E. Ivy |
| Robert Wathen, Carrie Phillips, R. Lawrence and Henderson County Jail |
| 4:2016cv00092 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Owensboro Office |
| Henderson |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 1/18/17: Plaintiff has failed to comply with this Court's Local Rules by failing to provide written notice of his current address, the Court concludes that this case must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will dismiss the action by separate Order. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff(pro se) (DJT)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 11/28/2016: Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be grant ed; Plaintiff's claims challenging his state-court charges are DISMISSED without prejudice; Plaintiff to amend complaint within 30 days. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a § 1983 complaint form with this case number and t he word Amended affixed thereto so that Plaintiff can include the additional Defendants and allegations set forth above. The Clerk of Court also is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff four blank summons forms. cc: Plaintiff (pro se) with Complaint form and 4 blank summons (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
