Minton v. Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. et al
| Kenneth Minton |
| Matthew Norwood, William Franke and Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv00074 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H McKinley |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Kenneth Minton. (Taylor, Caroline) |
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 8/19/2019. Upon request of counsel for the parties; IT IS ORDERED the Rule 26 Meeting Report as set forth in the Order at DN 9 shall be due no later than 8/29/2019. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/22/2019 is RESCHEDULED to be conducted on 9/5/2019 at 10:00 AM, CDT, before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. The Court will initiate the call. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (KLL)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand filed by Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Voigt - Order Denying Remand, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Remand) (Riley, David) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Kenneth Minton (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Taylor, Caroline) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline R. Taylor on behalf of Kenneth Minton (Taylor, Caroline) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER (EBOC) by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 7/16/2019: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 8/22/2019 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/20/2019. cc: counsel, KL (JM)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.. (Riley, David) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Matthew Norwood. (Riley, David) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by William Franke. (Riley, David) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.. (Riley, David) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL LETTER sent to Grayson Circuit Court re #1 Notice of Removal. (DJT) |
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 7/3/19: This action is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable H. BRENT BRENNENSTUHL, United States Magistrate Judge, for determination of non-dispositive matters pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Said Magistrate is empowered to conduct any hearings necessary for their resolution. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (DJT)
|
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL [NO ANSWER FILED] by Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc. from Grayson Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-207. Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0644-2898026, filed by Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complete State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Robert Cox, #4 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Brian Nichol, #5 Exhibit 4 - Declaration of Stony Bishop, #6 Exhibit 5 - Franke Affidavit of Consent, #7 Exhibit 6 - Norwood Affidavit of Consent) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
